Cardax FT Controller – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. Installation Guide. The Gallagher Controller has the ability to enforce business rules, monitor its environment, The Gallagher Controller (C) is the interface between the Gallagher Command Centre Server . Cardax IV & Wiegand Readers. Gallagher Controller (and single cabinet); C – Gallagher Controller PoE + Kit – Cardax IV .. The Gallagher Trophy FT electric fence.
|Published (Last):||2 February 2004|
|PDF File Size:||18.5 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||8.33 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The security solutions provider joins five other finalists in the Access Control Product of the Year category for its new generation of Controller, the Cardax FT Controller Widely regarded as the industry’s premier event, the IFSEC Security Industry Awards is both a celebration and an acknowledgement of excellence of the products and technological innovations influencing and shaping the industry and security professionals, the IFSEC Security Industry Awards runs alongside the IFSEC exhibition, making it the social event for the entire industry.
Access decisions can now take into account a person’s competency set such as licenses, clearances, inductions or training. Open Options, based in Addison, Texas, provides a truly open access control architecture that will strengthen the ACRE portfolio and increase the breadth of solutions offered by the global provider of security systems.
In a market that has traditionally been proprietary, the open-platform solution offered by Open Options helps deliver more opportunity to offer customers a full-scale solution based on their needs, says Grillo. In addition, due to its origin as a Texas-based company, the strength of Open Options in the Southwest provides significant additional coverage for ACRE in that region of the United States.
These resources were not as available to the company if it remained independent, Grillo notes. As discussions began earlier this year, ACRE realized the potential of adding to its access control portfolio in the North American market, says Grillo.
Open Options and Mercury have been “partners” for 20 years; Mercury provides hardware panels for Open Options systems.
This will be a benefit to Open Options, Vanderbilt and our customer base. However, importantly, each company will manage and make decisions about their reseller channels independently. This has been true since Beyond Passports, PIV cards represent the only other open-standards-based, multi-vendor-supported, identity credential program on the planet. This introduced an entire magnitude of additional complexity. Active government solicitations are issued for new, non-compliant, proximity-based systems that perpetuate the delay to HSPD complianceNew federal initiatives frequently suffer from having no policy to enforce their roll-out.
Policies have been in place for so long that newer policies like Office of Management and Budget OMB M February 3, remind everyone what the policies said in and Yet, on any given day, active government solicitations are issued for new, non-compliant, proximity-based systems that perpetuate the delay to HSPD compliance.
Gallagher Controllers | AES Group Ltd.
The usual suspects, policy and technology, are not the culprits for this epic delay. The opposite is true if your goal is interoperability: Consider the standards-based success story of chip-based credit cards. Interoperability failures are nearly unheard of. If you look at the hundreds of volumes of technical specifications that cover minute aspects of every component in credit cards and payment terminals, you quickly realize why it works so well.
Nothing is left to chance, nothing is a variable, and there is no optionality. Work to increase viability through deep scrutiny has progressed in recent years. This testing has significantly reduced interoperability failures at federal facilities. Collaboration — In the past, physical access practitioners from federal agencies rarely collaborated, unlike their logical access counterparts.
This is also true for PACS procurement decision-makers across agencies and facilities. Inan agency trend has emerged where finally physical access, physical security and IT practitioners have begun sitting down to discuss their shared responsibilities.
Variability — A significant percentage of facilities have unique aspects making a one-size-fits-all approach infeasible. Mature consulting services can now help agencies marry federal requirements with their unique environments to develop robust PACS enterprise architectures. As we see this occurring more and more frequently, a repeatable, achievable, systems-based upgrade of all PACS may be on the horizon. Sure, these tenants could commercially obtain a PIV-I credential, but almost none have.
Having to do capital planning for an assessment phase in advance of making the annual budget request for the PACS upgrade creates a never-ending cycle of delay. Especially at agencies with multi-year capital planning requirements. Many agencies, trying to avoid this delay cycle, have fallen prey to cradax site assessments themselves.
This results in their integrators doing their walk-throughs after the contract is awarded. This is the leading cause of PACS upgrade cost overruns.
Gallagher’s Cardax FT Controller 6000 In The Race For IFSEC 2010 Award
High-assurance PACS that validate credentials from other agencies must now communicate with many different systems on an enterprise network and over the Internet — so much so that the Federal Government reclassified PACS as IT systems. PSOs have spent decades achieving their positions. PIV-based PACS could not be more different from the technologies that proceeded it, and such radical change is often resisted.
When the value proposition is clear, change is adopted more readily. It is often said that the best performance review for a PSO is to note that nothing happened. And when something does happen, it is necessarily kept quiet so the risk can be remediated without calling attention to the vulnerability in the interim. To date, the value proposition of moving to PIV-based PACS has been entirely based on policy without corresponding funding in most cases and through the cqrdax value of white hat fg, showing how easily most proximity badges can be cloned.
Cardax Ft Controller pdf
This is not the stuff of change agents. No, these PACS challenges are not unique.
Cybersecurity initially faced many of the same challenges that federal PACS face today. Bythe Federal Government recognized its urgent need to improve cybersecurity practices across its computing infrastructure and issued many policies that required agencies to improve.
Improvement was sparse and inconsistent.
GSA Schedules were set up to help agencies buy approved products and services to assist them, but this too produced lacklustre results. The Federal Government found that the best cybersecurity results occurred vt enforced at the time an agency commissioned vs. This is the first time an enforcement approach has been brought forward that could reasonably succeed.
Pockets of compliance are popping up. Compliant procurements do exist, and the state of PACS across the Federal Government is better in than in any previous year.
Cardax Ft Controller 6000pdf
Progress to date has been at a constant rate. The energy distribution sector has been riding a wave of security upgrade demands to retrofit their facilities across the U.
The energy distribution sector, under nearly constant Advanced Persistent Threat attacks, has been riding a wave of security upgrade demands to retrofit their facilities across the U. The potential threat exists for Federal Government facilities as well. When that day arrives, the PIV card form factor may no longer be the key that fits that future lock. Taking decades to perform a technology upgrade is the aging elephant in the room no one talks about. By the time critical mass is achieved with an upgrade facing these many challenges, there are typically compelling reasons to start over again with the next generation of technology.
No two businesses are exactly alike, with some located in numerous buildings or spread out across campuses, while others have employees that frequently journey from different locations, work remotely or travel internationally.
Preferred Safety Measures Only 57 percent of respondents indicated that their workplace currently had preparedness drills in place for critical situationsThe survey looked at how employees and companies respond to various workplace emergencies: Respondents provided insight on the current state of safety in their workplace, as well as how they want to be contacted when an emergency occurs.
Though opinions on the preferred safety measures differed between generations and also between on-site and offsite workers, one fact remains consistent: While the findings show that employees feel safe in their workplace, only 57 percent of respondents indicated that their workplace currently had preparedness drills in place for critical situations. Quick Thinking Of the plans currently in place, excluding fire, 57 percent of the other major emergency plans were rarely or never tested.
With so few drills in place, employees are left not knowing the best ways to respond to emergencies like weather events or hazmat incidents or if their employer recommends a certain response to situations like medical emergencies. Testing these plans is essential so that all employees, whether they are new to the company or not, have the appropriate response top of mind and their actions become second nature during a situation that will likely require quick thinking.
Workplace Violence Instilling regular practices will only further ensure that responses will happen seamlessly, regardless of the emergency. Beyond the general awareness of drills and practices, most surprising in the responses was the fact that 34 percent of female respondents were unaware of workplace violence emergency plans. This is particularly shocking because workplace violence is the second leading cause of death for women in the workplace, according to the U. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
This shows an obvious lack of preparedness from organizations. The differences between baby boomers and millennials in the workplace is a common barometer showing how the workplace is continuing to change. Emergency Plans Workplace violence is the second leading cause of death for women in the workplace, according to the U. Bureau of Labour StatisticsWhat may have worked for previous generations must be reworked and adjusted so every generation is made aware of and understands the plans and procedures in place.
These changes can help make workplace safety plans fresh and continuously relevant. With that in mind, millennials currently represent the largest segment of employees unaware of emergency plans for major workplace emergencies.
This could be associated with the fact that some organizations are not communicating plans with newer employees or even that organizations that employ a significant number of millennials might not have plans in place at all. Affecting Everyday Work If the newest generation is unaware of these plans, then it is only a matter of time before Generation Z enters the workforce and is in even worse position when it comes to emergency awareness.
The survey results showed that on average, workplaces use two methods of communication for emergencies Feeling safe and secure at work should not be something that workers need to focus on, however more than a quarter of respondents that work remotely said that worrying about safety is exactly what is affecting their everyday work. Mass Text Messages At first, these methods seem to cover both remote and in-office employees, but survey results actually showed that both groups preferred and would be better reached during other methods.
While email is the second most common emergency method currently in place by organizations, it actually ranks as the fourth most preferred method at a mere 11 percent. Even with a clear preference towards communication via mass text messages by respondents 39 percent of remote workers prefer this methodless than 20 percent of companies actually take advantage of this technology.
This clear disconnect shows that organizations must find what works best for their employees instead of using methods that were previously established or that are just currently being used.
Preparedness Plans What remains important for organizations, regardless of size or industry, is to keep controlelr preparedness plans ever evolving Communication can not only be essential to alert employees to everyday situations, like office closures, but it is also imperative in preventing contrpller to escalate when they do occur.
Companies need to take steps to understand how their employees controlper like to be reached during an emergency, as well as how employees would also like to reach out to management to report their own concerns. What remains important for organizations, regardless of size or industry, is to keep emergency preparedness plans ever evolving and well communicated, so your employees are confident in the emergency plans in place.
By contro,ler planning and practicing for emergency events through table top exercises and drills, employers can demonstrate their commitment to employee safety and preparedness and build employee confidence. Home News Events news. Related companies Gallagher Security. View all news from Gallagher Security. Access control with Nedap at AZ Alma.