Paradox of Kurt Gödel. Reviewed by Juliette Kennedy. Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt. Gödel. Rebecca Goldstein. W. W. Norton & Company. fefe 1. Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel by Rebecca Goldstein. Weidenfeld, pp. Like Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, Gödel’s. Irving H. Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel by R. Goldstein . Rev. Mod. Log. 11 (), no. ,
|Published (Last):||26 March 2005|
|PDF File Size:||15.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.60 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
There is much more to it than that, but the primary implication is that mathematical truth exists apart from how humans conceive of it. Still, I wanted a little more. Apart from the formal parts of the third chapter, this is a very easy to grasp and recommendable reading for all those who want to make themselves more familiar epistemology, history of science, meta-mathematics and logic. After Einstein’s death, Goedel became increasingly isolated, and eventually paranoid, ending his life in a state of near-starvation brought on by a paranoid fear of poisoning.
Indeed the very notion of the objectively true is a socially constructed myth. She could have been saying that it can be stated without using numbers rather than the actual proof used no numbers.
The book spends surprising amount of time on Wittgenstein but he seems tangential at best to the story. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. It was largely over my head. There is much more to it than that, but the primary implication is that mathematical truth exists apart from how This book is an intellectual biography of one of the greatest mathematicians and logicians of the 20th century.
Another quibble of mine: Almost all of the brightest minds of Goedel’s time took his work to mean much the opposite, that all systems are incomplete and ibcompleteness absolute truth cannot exist.
Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel
The main negative incompletenesz the book, which is also paradoxically a strong positive, is its treatment of Wittgenstein. Einstein may have been the only person who was able to relate to Goedel at all levels both were German speakers who were driven from Europe by fascism, became famous for theoretical work cited far beyond its intended field, and ended their years at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton.
Goedel didn’t know or didn’t tell usand we’re still trying to figure it out today. Goedel’s ideas are so central to 20th century thinking that it is likely that Einstein for many years until his death Goedel’s closest friend was the only person he ever met who he was not, eventually, to become more famous prof influential than for example Wittgens David Foster Wallace RIP once referred to Kurt Goedel, the subject of this book, as mathematics’ Prince of Pqradox.
Godel himself rejected the notion of math as subjective. For a general reader like myself, one paradox might arise if we are asked to rely on Goldstein as an authority and to reject the opinions of other authorities, not least Wittgenstein. Most mathematicians happily go about their business without a thought about the two theorems. We are ourt unsure only about mathematics. People unaccountably will always do things which are bad for them.
Thanks for telling us about the problem. I think it tells us that the way in which even the most brilliant discoveries and original thinking are interpreted is controlled as paradix by the zeitgeist into which it emerges, as by the intentions of the creator or even the nature of the discovery itself.
The incompleteness of mathematics is just really hard to wrap your brain around; This is a great book to learn more about “Goedel’s Proof” actually two proofs, or actually rhe proofs if you count his Ph. Her book Incompleteness: Does this mean that God exists? Everything outside this reality, all meta-mathematics, was meaningless and of no importance to them.
For my money he was more spiritual than Augustine, as well as more committed to the idea iincompleteness truth.
I had just come through a very emotional time, having not only become a mother but having also lost my father, whom I adored. The user of language is trapped and is incapable of extricating himself from an existence of rational error – about himself as well as the world around him. She met him once in a rare congenial mood at a party at Princeton.
The more I think about language, the more it amazes me that people ever understand each other at all. Rebecca Goldstein attempts here to fill in the gaps as best we can. On the other hand, the author actually makes more sense out of Wittgenstein than anyone else I’ve oncompleteness, and the anecdotes about Wittgenstein are helpful in describing the intellectual scene around the Vienna Circle.
Incompleteness: The Proof and Paradox of Kurt Gödel by Rebecca Goldstein
One wonders if this wasn’t all simply a rejection of “absolute”, because the term “absolutism” had become associated with a political system in which all power is held by the central executive. What a wonderful book.
To finite man the infinite is an awesome, disturbing, and chaotic beast, forever mocking human aspirations and advances with its eternities and paradoxes and circularities. I do appreciate some of the references she gives, and look forward to reading more into his proofs themselves.